Tweet |
Introduction
In the Winter 21 release of Salesforce, access to AuraEnabled methods in Apex classes will be restricted to users with profiles or permission sets that grant access to those classes. If you've been working in a sandbox recently you've probably encountered this already, as the critical update for this was enabled on August 8th.
Figuring out who (if anyone) has access to classes isn't straightforward, as you have to trawl through the profiles and permission sets and check each one. Salesforce have created an Aura Enabled Scanner application that can be installed via an unlocked package, which checks packaged and unpackaged code, but it does require that you login to Salesforce each time you need to check things.
This seemed like a good candidate for my Org Documentor Salesforce CLI Plug-In - something that can be run on a schedule, check that any new classes used as controllers for Aura or Lightning Web Components are accessible, and show which profiles/permission sets have access.
Configuration
To add processing for AuraEnabled classes, an additional stanza is required in the configuration file passed to the bbdoc command - here's what it looks like in my example repo:
"auraenabled": { "name": "auraenabled", "description": "AuraEnabled Class Access", "subdirectory": ".", "image": "images/auraenabled.png", "suffix":"object", "groups": { "other": { "name":"other", "title":"AuraEnabled Components", "description": "All components with Apex controllers" } } }
As with other metadata types, you can specify multiple groups to slice up your components into functional areas - I've lumped them all into one group as I only have one component!
Output
The index (home) page for the org report displays a new card for the AuraEnabled metadata:
An error badge is displayed if there are one or more classes used as controllers for components that aren't accessible from any profile or permission set.
Clicking in to the details shows the groups and errors:
and clicking into the group shows the detail for each component, with classes that aren't accessible highlighted as errors:
Note that if a Lightning Web Component accesses multiple Apex classes, there will be a row for each class with the same component name in the report, as shown above.
Processing
I was quite pleased by how little code I had to write to add support for this:
-
A classes map structure is created in memory,
profilesAndPermSetsByClassname, where each entry has the Apex class name as
a key and a value object containing lists of permission sets and profiles
with access to the class. This is generated by loading all of the profile
and permission set metadata and iterating the ClassAccess sections.
-
The component groups are iterated, and for each entry in the group:
-
If it is an Aura Component, the controller attribute from the
<aura:component/> tag is extracted
-
If it is a Lighting Web Component (which can access multiple Apex
classes), @salesforce/apex/ lines are identified and the Apex class name
extracted.
For each class:
-
The entry for the class in the profilesAndPermSetsByClassname map is
extracted. If this is null or both of the profile and permission set
lists are empty, the classname is added to the error collection
displayed on the group page.
- A row is added to the JavaScript object backing the group page showing the profiles/permission sets that have access, adding the error highlight colour if there are none.
Plug-In
The updated bbddoc Salesforce CLI plug-in providing AuraEnabled support can be found on NPM, and the source code is available in the Github repository.
Why not use the AuraEnabledScanner?
You absolutely should - I do, to configure access. This works with the AuraEnabledScanner rather than replacing it. As development continues, new classes and components are added to your codebase. The Org Documentor flags up any that don't have appropriate access, and you can then login to an org that your metadata is deployed to, run the scanner and fix up the access.
The scanner also handles managed classes which the Org Documentor doesn't, as it works against your metadata on disk rather than everything installed in a specific org instance.
Related Posts
- The plug-in on NPMJS
- Documentation generated from the sample metadata
- Sample metadata repository
- Plug-in source repository
- Documentor Plugin - Triggers (and Bootstrap)
- Documenting from the metadata source with a Salesforce CLI Plug-in - Part 5
- Documenting from the metadata source with a Salesforce CLI Plug-in - Part 4
- Documenting from the metadata source with a Salesforce CLI Plug-In - Part 3
- Documenting from the metadata source with a Salesforce CLI Plug-In - Part 2
- Documenting from the metadata source with a Salesforce CLI Plug-In - Part 1
- Offline mobile app template plug-in Dreamforce 18 session
- Salesforce CLI Play-by-Play
- Salesforce CLI Cheat Sheet
No comments:
Post a Comment